|
|
|
![]() |
DHEA : Is replacement therapy needed? DHEA is secreted in humans, but not in rodents. So results of rodent studies cannot be translated into human effects. Animal studies show improved neuronal function and memory with increased glial survival. Human clinical studies in ageing subjects have been performed using 50mg or 100mg DHEAS for maximum of 6 months. DHEA increases estrogen in men and testosterone in women! In normal humans, adrenals produce DHEA,
which is converted (by 3βHSD) to androstenedione, which is in turn converted
(by 17βHSD) to testosterone and estradiol. Note that DHEA does not bind to
androgen receptors. A specific DHEA receptor has not yet been cloned. (as of
2004). Androgenic metabolites of DHEA (androstanediol glucuronide-metabolite of
DHT; and androsterone glucuronide) increase after DHEA administration resulting
in tissue specific action depending on expression of 3βHSD, 17βHSD, 5alpha
reductase and P450 aromatase. Epidemiological studies: Studies assessing effect of DHEA replacement in ageing patients with lower DHEA levels have not demonstrated significant benefit, although this could be interpreted to be the result of selection bias, due to recruitment of relatively healthy subjects in whom demonstration of further improvement might have been less likely anyway. Positive effects on IGF-1 have been variable in studies. Patients with Adrenal Insufficiency have severe loss of DHEA production in contrast to the mild decreases with ageing. The only trial from the UK (abstract from Cambridge) in adrenal insufficient men and women [for 12 months using 50 mg DHEA] has shown improved physiological function with improved femoral neck BMD. DHEA might prove to be a better way of treating female hypo-androgenism, than the presently used dose adjusted testosterone delivery with its accompanying pharmacokinetic problems. BMD rise with DHEA has mostly been restricted to elderly women. DHEA might prove to be a potential addition to the therapeutic armamentarium for osteoporosis or osteopenia.
Concerns: In conclusion, at all times, the difference between replacement of a severely depleted DHEA levels-as in hypoadrenal patients-has to be contrasted against the supplementation in mild decreases of ageing or in prospective body builders with normal DHEA levels. What needs to be known? Further research:
Should patients with MEN 1 have pre-emptive surgery? In MEN1, the mortality is mainly due to pancreaticoduodenal disease, and surgical option need to be considered early only in this setting. Even here, pancreatic disease tends to metastasise to the liver only after the tumour has reached at least 3cms or more. So many surgeons wait till this criteria is met. Duodenal disease can metastasise to the peri-duodenal lymph nodes very early in the course of the tumour, but still liver metastases occurs only late in the disease, and that too only in 10%. So again the decision to operate could be delayed? Many surgeons feel operative "cure" is probably not possible anyway, and hence pre-emptive surgery might not be worth the while? A duodenotomy is recommended in any patient with raised gastrin levels and positive secretin test irrespective of whether a tumour is found in the duodenum or not! Surgery would be useful to improve the hypergastrinaemia related symptoms as well. Due to the rarity of this condition, very few randomised prospective data is available.
Why does pituitary failure cause
hypotension despite preservation of the aldosterone?
Why do depressed alcoholic and obese patients not suppress adequately on Dexamethasone suppression tests?
Would a combination of cortisone
and cortisol be better than cortisol alone in replacement therapy?
What is the ideal physiological replacement dose of hydrocortisone?
Which is best for steroid replacement? Hydrocortisone, Prednisolone or Dexamethasone? Why?
How do steroids cause Osteoporosis? Is there any evidence for duration as opposed to dosing and osteoporosis?
|