Table showing summary of above studies
Tolbutamide- a short acting sulphonylureas has been shown to reduce the conversion of IGT to T2DM although study designs were less than modern.
DPP (diabetes prevention programme)
USA 2002
3234 subjects
>25 years age Mean age 51 years
Mean BMI 34
FBS 5.3-6.9 2hr 7.8-11 i.e. IGT
Placebo or Metformin 850 BD
+ lifestyle advice
The goals were to:
achieve and maintain a weight loss of 7 percent with healthy eating and increased physical activity
maintain physical activity at least 150 minutes a week with moderate exercise, such as walking or biking.
2.8 years follow up
Outcome:
Reduction of risk of diabetes
Life style- 58%
Metformin- 31%
Clearly lifestyle interventions were better than metformin itself!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
F-DPS (Finish Diabetes prevention
study)
Finnish
Outcome:
Diabetes incidence
Control group 23%Intervention (Lifestyle) group 11%Relative risk reduction of 58%
ref: Br J Nutr. 2000 Mar;83 Suppl 1:S137-42.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International multicenter
1368 subjects
40-70 years age
BMI 25-40
IGT with FBS 5.6-7.8
Acarbose 100 mg tds vs. placebo
3.3 years; intention to treat analysis
Outcome: Diabetes incidence:
Acarbose group 32.4%
Placebo 41.5%
relative risk reduction of 25%
Read further on STOP- NIDDM (PDF)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
577 subjects
>25 years age
Mean BMI 25
IGT
Diet, exercise, diet &exercise, general advice
6 year follow up
Diabetes Incidence in the respective groups:
44%, 41%, 46%, 68%.
The Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study. Pan X-R 1 , Li G-W, Hu Y-H et al. Diabetes Care 1997; 20/4: 537 44.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ongoing study from netherlands
A total of 102 subjects with IGT randomised into two groups.
Subjects in the intervention group received regular dietary advice, and
were stimulated to lose weight and to increase their physical activity. The control group received only brief information about the beneficial
effects of a healthy diet and increased physical activity. Before and after the first year, glucose tolerance was measured and
several other measurements were done.
RESULTS:
Body weight loss after 1 y was higher in the
intervention group.
The 2-h blood glucose concentration decreased 0.8+/-0.3 mmol/l in the intervention group and increased 0.2+/-0.3 mmol/l in the control group (P<0.05). Body weight loss and increased physical fitness were the most important determinants of improved glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity.
Full text: Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003 Mar;27(3):377-84.
Summary Table of diabetes prevention studies
| Study | Country | Duration | Criteria | Age, Mean BMI | Intervention | Incidence of DMLifestyle vs placebo | RRR | NNT |
| Da Qing | China | 6 yrs | IGT ,577 | 45 yrs, BMI 25.8 | Diet, Exercise or both | 66 vs 44 | 46 | 4.5 |
| DPS | Finland | 4 yrs | IGT, 522 | 55 yrs, BMI 31 | Diet, Exercise | 23 vs 11 | 58 | 8 |
| DPP | USA | 3 yrs | IGT, 3234 | 51 yrs BMI 31 | lifestyle or Metformin | 28 vs 14 | 58 | 7 |
| Metformin vs placebo 28 vs 21 31 14 | ||||||||
|
STOP NIDDM |
Canada, Germany, Austria, Israel, Spain |
3 yrs |
IGT, 1429 |
55 yrs BMI 31 |
Acarbose |
42 vs 32 |
24 |
11 |
Br J Nutr. 2000 Mar;83 Suppl 1:S137-42.
The
Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study.
Uusitupa M, Louheranta A, Lindstrom J, Valle T, Sundvall J, Eriksson J,
Tuomilehto J.
The aim of the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study is to assess the efficacy
of an intensive diet-exercise programme in preventing or delaying type 2
diabetes in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and to
evaluate the effect of the programme on the risk factors of atherosclerotic
vascular diseases and the incidence of cardiovascular events. In this
ongoing study, a total of 523 overweight subjects with IGT based on two oral
glucose tolerance tests were randomized to either an intervention group or a
control group. The main measure in the intervention group is individual
dietary advice aimed at reducing weight and intake of saturated fat and
increasing intake of dietary fibre. The intervention subjects are
individually guided to increase their level of physical activity. The
control group receives general information about the benefits of weight
reduction, physical activity and healthy diet in the prevention of diabetes.
A pilot study began in 1993, and recruitment ended in 1998. By the end of
April 1999 there were 65 new cases of diabetes, 34 drop-outs and one death.
The weight reduction was greater (-4.6 kg) at 1 year in the intervention
group (n = 152) than in the control group (n = 143, -0.9 kg, P < 0.0001),
and this difference was sustained in the second year of follow-up. At 1 year
43.4% and at 2 years 41.8% of the intervention subjects had achieved a
weight reduction of at least 5 kg, while the corresponding figures for the
control subjects were 14.0 and 12.0% (P < 0.001 between the groups). At 1
year the intervention group showed significantly greater reductions in 2 h
glucose, fasting and 2 h insulin, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and
serum triglycerides. Most of the beneficial changes in cardiovascular risk
factors were sustained for 2 years. These interim results of the ongoing
Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study demonstrate the efficacy and feasibility
of the lifestyle intervention programme.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003 Mar;27(3):377-84.
Study on Lifestyle Intervention and Impaired Glucose
Tolerance Maastricht (SLIM): preliminary results after one year.
Mensink M, Feskens EJ, Saris WH, De Bruin TW, Blaak EE.
AIMS: Important risk factors for the progression from impaired glucose
tolerance to type II diabetes mellitus are obesity, diet and physical
inactivity. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a
lifestyle-intervention programme on glucose tolerance in Dutch subjects with
impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). METHODS: A total of 102 subjects were
studied, randomised into two groups. Subjects in the intervention group
received regular dietary advice, and were stimulated to lose weight and to
increase their physical activity. The control group received only brief
information about the beneficial effects of a healthy diet and increased
physical activity. Before and after the first year, glucose tolerance was
measured and several other measurements were done. RESULTS: Body weight loss
after 1 y was higher in the intervention group. The 2-h blood glucose
concentration decreased 0.8+/-0.3 mmol/l in the intervention group and
increased 0.2+/-0.3 mmol/l in the control group (P<0.05). Body weight loss
and increased physical fitness were the most important determinants of
improved glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSION: A
lifestyle-intervention programme according to general recommendations is
effective and induces beneficial changes in lifestyle, which improve glucose
tolerance in subjects with IGT. Body weight loss and increased physical
fitness were the most important determinants of improved glucose tolerance
and insulin sensitivity
Read more about studies in diabetes prevention here (needs free registration at the site)
Read more about IGT at the International Diabetes Federation website
This page was last updated on : 16/01/2007